Pandemic Effects on Goodwill Impairment
The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically impacted the macroeconomic environment. As equity markets have crashed and a recession looms, it’s important for CFOs and Controllers to stay ahead of the changing landscape. For companies that have been acquisitive and carry significant goodwill (or other intangible assets) on their books, it may be time to assess the need to perform an interim goodwill impairment test.
As noted in Account Standards Update (ASU) 350, goodwill of a reporting unit should be tested between annual tests “if an event occurs, or circumstances change, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount”. Examples of such events and circumstances from ASU 350 include the following:
- Macroeconomic conditions such as a deterioration in general economic conditions, limitations on accessing capital, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, or other developments in equity and credit markets
- Industry and market considerations such as a deterioration in the environment in which an entity operates, an increased competitive environment, a decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics (consider in both absolute terms and relative to peers), a change in the market for an entity’s products or services, or a regulatory or political development
- Cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows
- Overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows or a decline in actual or planned revenue or earnings compared with actual and projected results of relevant prior periods
- Other relevant entity-specific events such as changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers; contemplation of bankruptcy; or litigation
- Events affecting a reporting unit such as a change in the composition or carrying amount of its net assets, a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing all, or a portion, of a reporting unit, the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, or recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit
- If applicable, a sustained decrease in share price (consider in both absolute terms and relative to peers).
During this time of uncertainty and COVID-19’s implications on financial reporting and valuation, we are available to discuss and answer any questions you may have to help be better prepared.
About The McLean Group
For over 30 years, The McLean Group has been providing investment banking and financial services offerings focused on the Defense, Government & Intelligence (DGI), Security, Critical Infrastructure, Maritime, Facility Services, Unmanned Systems, and Public Safety markets. Our 60+ professionals bring deep industry experience and relentless execution to every client engagement. We provide solutions that blend financial creativity with operational expertise. Whether we are providing transaction advisory, valuation opinions, or growth capital, our services are unmatched in these core markets. Learn more at www.McLeanLLC.com.
RECENT NEWS
PCC Elections for Private Company Acquisitions: What PE Sponsors, Portfolio Company CFOs, and Their Advisors Need to Know Before Making the Call
Private Company Council (PCC) accounting elections offer PE-backed companies a meaningful opportunity to reduce the scope and cost of purchase price allocation work, but the decision carries long-term implications that extend well beyond the close. Under ASU 2014-02, private companies may amortize goodwill on a straight-line basis over up to 10 years, eliminating the burden of annual impairment testing. Under ASU 2014-18, customer-related intangibles and noncompetition agreements may be subsumed into goodwill rather than separately recognized and valued. Together, these elections can streamline acquisition accounting and lower ongoing audit and compliance costs, but they also introduce restatement risk if the portfolio company later pursues an IPO or is acquired by a public buyer. For PE sponsors, the decision should be evaluated in the context of the fund’s exit thesis and applied consistently across portfolio companies. […]
Revenue Looks Strong on Paper – But ASC 606 Compliance in Construction Tells a Different Story
Revenue looks strong on paper – but ASC 606 compliance in construction tells a different story. In this case study, The McLean Group’s Financial Consulting and Transaction Due Diligence teams walk through a real construction services engagement where a project-level ASC 606 review surfaced a pattern of revenue recognition issues that materially changed the earnings picture. We examine the KPIs that matter most, including cost-to-complete accuracy, change order approval rates, and over and under billing trends, and explain why ASC 606 compliance deserves the same rigor in diligence as working capital analysis or debt-like items. […]
Purchase Price Allocations Under ASC 805: What Every PE-Backed CFO and Deal Team Needs to Know
A purchase price allocation (PPA) is the first post-close workstream that directly affects reported EBITDA, lender covenant calculations, and eventual exit valuation for PE-backed acquirers. Under ASC 805, every acquisition requires the buyer to allocate the total purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities at fair value — including intangibles that never appeared on the target’s balance sheet. For middle-market deals, identified intangibles commonly represent 30–60% of total consideration, and each carries its own valuation methodology, useful life assumption, and amortization consequence. The McLean Group’s Valuation Advisory team breaks down what every CFO, controller, and deal team needs to know about getting the allocation right the first time. […]